The combination of airline delays and Amtrak’s increasing ridership is generating goodwill that could lead to more support for passenger rail, according to a report in today’s Wall Street Journal.
Over the last 10 months, ridership on Amtrak’s fast Acela trains in the Washington-Boston corridor is up 20% — “enough new passengers to fill 2,000 Boeing 757 jets.” Ridership in the Chicago-St. Louis corridor is up 53% in the 10 months through July, the paper said. It could’ve mentioned recent gains in Cascadia too.
Hopefully this trend eases some opposition to investing in rail. Then we could talk about breaking up the Amtrak monopoly and introducing more market forces aimed at improving passenger rail rather than dismantling it.
The article suggests some encouraging signs:
“You have to begin to put the infrastructure in place to put in high-speed trains,” says Gordon Bethune, who retired in 2004 as chief executive of Continental Airlines Inc. “It should be a national priority. If the French can do it, why can’t we?”
Another airline-industry legend Robert Crandall, former CEO of American Airlines parent AMR Corp., says improvements to Amtrak’s network in the Northeast are one of the best ways to reduce aviation gridlock.
In Cascadia, it’s going to be a long process — even in Washington, which has funded some rail improvements. Among other things, we need more support from the B.C. government to speed the Seattle-Vancouver corridor.
Comments
4 responses to “Airline snafus boost support for rail”
Every time Amtrak has a press release they always show images of highly refined, sophisticated wonders of engineering. And then when the finished product is revealed it’s always clunky, awkward and poorly designed. The attached photo looks like a hot concept – straight out of a modern, Scandinavian design mag. What happens between schematics and production every time?
I love all this talk about regional rail in Cascadia, but I have a couple of problems: 1. Cascadia would only be improving outdated technology, and 2. The 1-5 corridor is the only thing that is getting attention.
I support throwing out the Amtrak monopoly, but the only way that will happen is if other corporations demand an opportunity to compete. That hasn’t been the case until recent with the gas price hikes. I wish airline companies would take the lead. The future of air travel is continental and galatic-al. Inner land travel needs to be rail, or rather mag-rail.
Magplanes are the future trains, but god bless America for leading the way into yesterday’s technology. Yeah, we should build steel rail and travel 200 miles per hour or more slower than Japan and France. And yeah, that will look good to investors. Recently, the magnetic magplanes hit a land speed record of 350mph. I heard from a State of Washing Department of Transporation Executive that the best an improved rail system from Portland, OR to Vancouver, B.C. would get is 110mph. Magplanes are expensive because they are new, but I bet one day someone invents a magplane that beats the sound barrier while the Pacific Northwest will be seeking to bring back the steam engine. Everyone should visit http://www.magplane.com and seriously start talking about investing in tomorrow’s technology.
The next topic is the bioregion of Cascadia. Why is it that we’re only talking about improving the rail connection between Portland, Seattle, and Vancouver? What about Idaho and Montana? What about Northern California? The future of the urban city is the smaller 30,000 to 60,000 population city. We will need a high-speed rail system to connect all of these satellites that are spread out over the entire bioregion of Cascadia.
Check out this Washington Department of Transportation website:
http://faculty.washington.edu/jbs/itrans/
Andrew, good point about the technology. I should point out that I’m the one responsible for the space-age image above.
Collin, I think the trick is figuring out how to pay for it. We’re using existing technology because it’s realistic. If we redirected some of the subsidy to freeways to trains the efficiency would go up. Plus, there would be benefits like curbing sprawl and cutting pollution.