Category: Cascadia not cities

  • Widening gap in urban-rural income

    The wealth gap between rural and urban areas is the subject of a New York Times story today that focuses on the waning fortune of Oakridge, Oregon, a depressed logging town near Eugene.

    As elsewhere in rural Cascadia, high-paying blue-collar jobs that supported families disappeared when the local mill closed:

    Expressed in 2005 dollars, the average pay for a full-time worker in rural Oregon fell to $27,600 in 2005 from $34,200 in 1976. Over the same period, average pay in urban counties in Oregon climbed to $37,800, putting the rural-urban gap at $10,200 and rising, according to the Oregon Employment Department.

    In Oregon the rural poverty rate was 13.8 percent in 2003, 2.4 points higher than in urban areas, according to statistics from the U.S.D.A. Rural poverty in Washington rose to 13.4 percent, 2.7 points more than in urban areas.

  • Time to plan for more open space

    A century ago Seattle was barely a frontier town, but it still had the foresight to sponsor the Olmstead Brothers to design a plan for parks. Today the plans that set aside well-used green space from Lake Washington to the Arboretum to Ravenna are a key part of the city.

    Now Seattle needs to plan for new open spaces to support a city that may have, by 2100, twice its current population. This article by a designer and a professor tries to get the ball rolling.

  • Fixing globalization will take more than this

    “I always vote but it doesn’t seem to make a difference. What else can I do?” That was the question of a gray-haired lady who took time on a sunny Saturday afternoon to hear a senator from North Dakota talk about making globalization more fair.
    unloading containers

    Unfortunately Senator Byron Dorgan didn’t give answers. In Seattle to promote his new book Take This Job and Ship It, he told a few dozen people sad tales of workers who had lost their jobs when companies shifted production abroad. An example: he said he’s outraged that Huffy bicycles are now made in China by workers who are paid 33 cents an hour while American taxpayers are stuck paying the pensions of former American workers.

    Dorgan wrote the book because he’s frustrated that Republicans in Congress control trade policy. He rightly blamed the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and its corporate backers for laws that ignore the concerns of workers. But will populist anger without solutions win Democrats votes?

    Obviously there are lots of losers in the current form of globalization. Yet in Cascadia, the most trade-dependent region on the continent, people want to hear how to make the system work better. Leaders need to explain concrete steps that can help more people benefit, things like better educating Americans (and Canadians!) while improving environmental and worker standards overseas.

    In a nod to Seattle’s reason for being, several times Dorgan said “I support trade. I’m not against trade. But it has to be fair trade.” But that’s a classic canard of protectionists. In fact, Dorgan voted for the 2002 Farm Bill, which unfairly doles out billions of taxpayer dollars to support prices of U.S. crops so farmers in poorer countries can’t compete. Their only choice is to shift to cut-rate manufacturing — an opportunity corporations eagerly provide.

    Dorgan’s book actually includes some solid ideas (tax policy that discourages exporting jobs and pollution, for example). If the book reaches readers who are brainwashed by pro-globalization cheerleaders like Tom Friedman it may add to the policy debate. But Dorgan wasted his opportunity in Seattle, leaving yet another old lady and many like her worried about globalization with no idea what to do about it.

  • more on mcgavick’s contortions

    To win a seat in the U.S. Senate this fall, Mike McGavick needs to persuade Washington’s middle-of-the-road voters AND every conservative Republican.

    On issue after issue, this requires contortions. The Stranger has a succinct report on how McGavick is finessing his support for teaching creationism in schools. He’s repeating the performance on other subjects at campaign stops around the state.

    To keep the effort going, McGavick announced on Friday that he is loaning his campaign $2 million. The money, of course, is part of the mega-million payday McGavick got from his time as CEO of Safeco. Thanks to Safeco, McGavick can more than match the personal fortune Senator Maria Cantwell used in 2000 to defeat McGavick’s old boss, Slade Gorton.

  • Restraining Cascadia’s nanny side

    Restraining Cascadia’s nanny tendencies seems about as easy as eliminating salal from one of the region’s fields.

    vancouver fireworksJust as Seattle seems to grow up and enjoy itself, opposition fights to keep it quiet. The number of licenses to sell liquor, for example, has risen almost 60 percent since 1997 as new clubs and bars have opened.

    But Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels is harassing bar and club owners into signing agreements with a long list of operating limitations designed to make them “good neighbors” by keeping the area around their businesses quiet after hours. The city has obsessed for years over how to handle benign strip clubs and police regularly crack down with excessive force on club-going crowds downtown.

    Now this week city police handed out a record number of tickets for “boating while intoxicated” during the annual Seafair hydroplane races. Editorialists applauded the crackdown.

    There are similarities in Vancouver, where at least some residents have been trying to shake the city’s “no-fun” image with a campaign and a web site, funcouver.com. Why become just another picturesque town filled with restaurants and shopping but scant nightlife?

    The city is considering if it could loosen its drinking laws. Drinking at the summer fireworks show should lead to less enforcement in general, according to the argument.

    Clearly the rules are local land-use issues that need to take into account the wishes of all the residents. But they should consider that having places to party, let off steam and celebrate is part of what makes Cascadia’s unique quality of life.

  • Burner launches first TV ad

    Darcy Burner launched her first TV ad in her challenge to Republican Congressman Dave Reichert (R – WA, 8th) today. The introductory 60-second spot can be viewed on her campaign web site.

    The ad is running thanks to Burner’s fundraising, which made the suburban Seattle U.S. House race one of the few competitive ones in the country and the only in Cascadia that’s drawn significant national attention. Republicans drew fire for inaccurate TV ads paid for by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

    Burner’s restrained ad makes the case for “change,” hitting all the popular notes. She talks about her family connections to the military and her personal history, all over film of her walking with her family and talking with nodding senior citizens.

  • Green’s strange rationale to defeat cantwell

    Green Party candidate Aaron Dixon has a novel justification for his run against Senator Maria Cantwell, who is well-known for having a strong environmental record.

    Dixon claims there’s no difference between Cantwell and Republican challenger Mike McGavick, who benefits from oil industry contributions and whose environmental policy includes support for increased drilling on public lands. Never mind that McGavick’s more pro-Iraq war than Cantwell or that Cantwell led the campaign against oil drilling in the Arctic, allowing tankers in Puget Sound and for more renewable energy.

    Apparently Dixon doesn’t mind if he siphons enough votes for the Republican to win: “Maria has supported the war, and the war has created a tremendous environmental destruction in Iraq,” Dixon said, according to the report.

  • New growth spilling over the Cascades

    The Puget Sound-area economy has long been red-hot thanks to the technology industry. Two reports suggest some of the growth is spilling over the mountains to eastern Washington.

    Suncadia, a 6,300-acre resort project 80 miles east of Seattle, announced multi-year plans to add more condos, golf courses and a major retail community. The project targets urban residents who otherwise would have driven to British Columbia for a resort. The article quotes a Bellevure resident who just bought:

    “We always wanted to get some place that we could get to from Seattle,” she said. “We were looking at Whistler, and it was just too far.”

    Meanwhile another kind of growth is coming from tech firms planning to use cheap power in eastern Washington for data centers. Investments by Microsoft and Google have been well reported. Now a Seattle developer plans a facility for smaller tech companies looking for similar services.

    Though neither promises massive job gains, diversificatin is good for the agriculture-dominated economy. “It is really a shift and a change into a whole labor market that we have never had before,” an official with the Port of Douglas County told the P-I. “We are quite excited about it.”

  • Cascadia ports may get new local competition

    Ports in Seattle, Tacoma and Vancouver are Cascadia’s shipping gateways. Now an American man is investing up to $500 million to build a container-port operation in Prince Rupert, a town on the British Columbia coast about 500 miles north of Vancouver.

    A story in the Wall Street Journal Tuesday explains that the new operation through tiny Prince Rupert could shave two days’ transit for goods from China bound to Chicago. Ships would arrive in the town’s naturally deep harbor and travel across Canada on a train line that has excess capacity (instead of on congested routes through the U.S.).

    The project still faces many obstacles. But it underscores how much competition Cascadia’s major ports face.

    A couple of years ago Vancouver benefited while Seattle, Portland and California’s ports suffered through a strike. Each port has since expanded to meet demand from the booming trade with Asia, providing more business for everyone.

    Yet when an inevitable downturn in business comes, the key question will return: who can do the business fastest and at the lowest cost?

  • Now Victoria has to figure out HOW to treat its sewage

    According to recent orders by the provincial government, Victoria has to start treating its sewage. But how?

    The orders, reported here last month, require the British Columbia capital to have a plan for at least some treatment of its outflow by June 2007. But according to this concise report Monday in The Tyee, there is no agreement on what to do by that deadline:

    The politicians are swimming hard to pop up on the right side of the tide now, but they are largely still coming to terms with having to move forward at all.

    Local business and tourism groups want strict standards for secondary treatment, mimicing what’s long been done a few miles south in Washington. Proposals range from simple processing plants to expensive measures that would reclaim usable water and generate power.

    It will be fascinating to see if B.C. chooses the bare minimum or technology that sets a new standard.